California rules foreign dividends includible in sales factor denominator

ARTICLE | March 07, 2024

Authored by RSM US LLP

Executive summary: California Office of Tax Appeals denies rehearing in apportionment case

On Feb. 14, 2024, the California Office of Tax Appeals (OTA) issued an opinion denying a Petition for Rehearing (PFR) filed by the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) in an appeal regarding whether Microsoft Corporation and Subsidiaries (Microsoft or Company) could include repatriated foreign earnings in its sales factor denominator. In the initial decision issued on July 27, 2023, the OTA held that the taxpayer could recompute its sales factor denominator to include the gross receipts from the repatriated foreign dividends. The FTB subsequently filed a PFR with the OTA arguing that the initial decision was contrary to law and should be overturned. The OTA held that the ruling in favor of the taxpayer was not contrary to law and the repatriated earnings were properly included in Microsoft’s California denominator. A summary of the case and what the decision means for taxpayers follow below.

Microsoft decision in detail

Case facts

Microsoft received repatriated dividends from certain unitary controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) during fiscal year ending June 30, 2018. In computing California net income, the Company deducted 75% of the repatriated dividends from its tax base as ‘qualifying dividends,’ and therefore 25% of the dividends were included in its income subject to apportionment. On its originally filed water’s edge return, the Company included 25% of the dividends in its sales factor denominator because that was the portion of the qualifying dividends represented in its net income. However, the Company subsequently filed a refund claim with the FTB asserting that the gross amount of the repatriated dividends should be included in the denominator, which would result in a significant reduction to the Company’s California apportionment factor. The FTB denied the refund claim and the Company subsequently appealed to the OTA.

The initial decision

After oral argument, the OTA unanimously agreed with Microsoft and reversed the FTB’s decision to deny the refund claim. The OTA determined that 1) the gross amount of qualifying dividends should be included in the denominator notwithstanding the fact that the dividends are partially deducted from the tax base, and 2) that the dividends should not be excluded from the denominator pursuant to California’s ‘occasional sale’ rule. The OTA reasoned that the plain language of the statutory definition of ‘gross receipts’ identifies certain items of income not included as a gross receipt, but does not specifically address the qualifying dividends subject to a dividend received deduction. Thus, because the language of the statute did not specifically exclude the repatriated dividends, they clearly fell within the definition of gross receipt (under Cal. Rev. & Tax Code section 25120(f)(2)) such that they should be included in the Company’s sales factor denominator. The OTA also disagreed with the FTB’s position that the sales factor had an inherent “matching principle” which required exclusion of receipts that were not included in Microsoft’s apportionable income. The FTB then filed the PFR with the OTA, asserting that the decision was contrary to law and the case should be reconsidered.

The petition for rehearing

On Feb. 14, 2024, the OTA denied the FTB’s petition for rehearing and upheld the decision in favor of Microsoft. The OTA concluded that the initial decision was not contrary to law, there were no irregularities in the appeal proceedings, and there was not any newly discovered, material evidence. Accordingly, the FTB had not established the statutory grounds for a rehearing. With the OTA’s decision to deny the PFR, the OTA’s initial decision becomes final and the FTB is unable to further appeal.


While the OTA has not indicated whether the opinion will become precedential (neither opinion has been published to the OTA as of the date of this article), the decision gives support for other similarly situated taxpayers to take the same approach to calculating the California sales factor. Taxpayers with repatriated foreign earnings subject to the qualifying dividends deduction may have a position to file refund claims to include the gross amount in the sales factor denominator on prior year returns.

Taxpayers with questions about Microsoft, or California apportionment generally should speak to their California state tax advisers for more information.

Let's Talk!

Call us at +1 213.873.1700, email us at or fill out the form below and we'll contact you to discuss your specific situation.

  • Topic Name:
  • Should be Empty:

This article was written by Chris Gauss, Amy Letourneau, Rick Capossela, Kristopher Jackson and originally appeared on 2024-03-07.
2022 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM US LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM US LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

RSM US Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each is separate and independent from RSM US LLP. RSM US LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax, and consulting firms. Members of RSM US Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM US LLP but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit us for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. The RSM logo is used under license by RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM US LLP.

​Vasquez & Company LLP is a proud member of the RSM US Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms in the United States. RSM US Alliance provides our firm with access to resources of RSM US LLP, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market. RSM US LLP is a licensed CPA firm and the U.S. member of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms with more than 43,000 people in over 120 countries.

Our membership in RSM US Alliance has elevated our capabilities in the marketplace, helping to differentiate our firm from the competition while allowing us to maintain our independence and entrepreneurial culture. We have access to a valuable peer network of like-sized firms as well as a broad range of tools, expertise and technical resources.

For more information on how ​Vasquez & Company LLP can assist you, please call +1 213.873.1700.

Subscribe to receive important updates from our Insights and Resources.

  • Should be Empty: