REITs must be aware of the unique tax rules for hedging instruments
ARTICLE | September 27, 2021
Authored by RSM US LLP
A real estate investment trust (REIT) is generally taxed as a corporation, yet escapes the double taxation imposed by the corporate tax regime through a dividends-paid deduction. REIT tax compliance is highly complicated and designed to ensure that REITs primarily invest in real estate. As such, a REIT must pass many tests including, but not limited to, the 95-percent and 75-percent annual gross income tests1 in order to maintain its tax-advantaged REIT status. When evaluating its sources of gross income for purposes of conducting these tests, a REIT must assess the nature of its hedges and ensure its compliance with various administrative requirements related to hedge identification to determine how to appropriately classify its hedge income for purposes of the 95-percent and 75-percent income tests.
REIT hedging transactions
REITs often use hedging instruments, such as an interest rate swaps or caps, to mitigate the risk associated with interest rate or currency fluctuations. Any income from such instruments must be evaluated for REIT income testing purposes as the rules that exist are often overlooked in practice.
For purposes of the REIT income tests, a non-qualified hedge will produce income that is included in the denominator, but not the numerator. This is generally referred to as “bad” REIT income because it reduces the fraction and makes it more difficult to meet the tests. In contrast, a qualified hedge will produce income that is excluded from both the numerator and denominator of both the 95-percent and 75-percent gross income tests. It will thus neither help nor hurt in applying these tests.
In order to constitute a qualified hedge for REIT purposes2 , the hedging transaction must be classified as a hedge for tax purposes3 , be properly identified4 , and relate to either 1) interest rate fluctuations with respect to debt used to acquire or carry real estate assets, or 2) currency fluctuations with respect to a qualifying item under the REIT income tests.5 Any hedging transaction that fails to satisfy all of these requirements will be categorized as a non-qualified hedge.
It is important to note that the identification of a hedging instrument must be done contemporaneously with the execution of the hedge. Specifically, the REIT must properly identify the hedge before the close of the business of the applicable execution date.6 Given the extremely time-sensitive nature of these rules, it is easy to see how an unwary REIT could run afoul of the administrative requirements.7
Recent private letter rulings (PLRs)
Two recent private letter rulings (PLRs)8 serve as a helpful reminder of the hedge identification requirements. While the recent PLRs do not analyze the validity of the hedges and whether they have been appropriately identified for tax purposes, these taxpayer-favorable PLRs supplement similar IRS guidance issued in 20149 and discuss the relevant guidance that exists related to hedges and REIT’s. All of these PLRs address both original and counteracting hedges.
Despite the generally favorable outcome of the rulings, the IRS stopped short of ruling on whether the arrangements in question actually constituted hedging transactions.10 Instead, the PLRs relied on taxpayer representations that the arrangements were hedging transactions for tax purposes. The IRS favorable rulings with respect to the original hedges are not surprising in light of the applicable statutory language.11 The more noteworthy aspect of the rulings is perhaps the courts' reliance on the discretionary authority subsequently referenced in the statute12 in determining that the counteracting hedges meet the REIT hedge criteria.
With regards to the PLRs, taxpayers should be mindful that they are specific to the taxpayer to whom they are issued. They may not be relied upon as authority with respect to tax positions taken by any other taxpayers. Nonetheless, PLRs can be relied upon to augment an argument that there is “authority” for purposes of avoiding tax penalties imposed on positions lacking a “reasonable basis” or “substantial authority.” Thus, PLRs provide perspective, but no guarantees of how the IRS may interpret a similar issue for an unrelated taxpayer.
It is worth noting that a recently released IRS 2015-16 Priority Guidance Plan includes a regulations project addressing the REIT income tests, but the timing and scope of such regulations remain largely uncertain. It is unknown whether any new guidance will address the REIT hedging transaction rules, and if so, whether any such guidance will be received favorably in the REIT community.
At the time a hedge is acquired, the risk that it could generate enough bad REIT income to compromise a REIT's qualification may appear inconsequential, even if it is considered a non-qualified hedge. However, the risk of major, unexpected changes in interest rates or currency values should not be disregarded. Thus, a healthy focus on full technical compliance with all of the rules may be warranted.
At the end of the day, the hedging transaction identification requirements a REIT must adhere to are not overly burdensome, particularly compared to many other REIT rules. However, a lack of awareness of the rules, and their very time-sensitive identification requirements, can yield unwanted consequences. By recognizing and considering the issue, a REIT has a better chance of mitigating such problems. As always, taxpayers who have already entered into or are considering entering into a hedging transaction should contact their tax advisors to discuss the implications of the identification requirements and related rules.
1 See sections 856(c)(2)-(3).
2 See section 856(c)(5)(G).
3 See section 1221(b)(2).
4 See section 1221(a)(7).
5 See sections 1221(b)(2)(A) and 856(c)(5)(G)(i)-(ii).
6 See sections 856(c)(5)(G)(i)-(ii) and 1221(a)(7).
7 A REIT, or any pass-through entity a REIT is invested in that enters into a hedge must contemporaneously identify and memorialize the identification of, the hedging transaction in its books and records. This documentation should specifically denote that the identification of the hedging instrument is being made for tax purposes. The file memorandum, or similar document, should generally include the following: 1) the effective date of the hedging transaction, 2) a description of the hedging instrument, 3) a description of the hedging transaction, and 4) the amount hedged. The applicable regulations provide further detailed guidance on the documentation requirements. See Reg. section 1.1221-2(f)(1).
8 See PLRs 201527012 and 201527013
9 See PLR 201406009
10 See section 1221(a)(7) and Reg. section 1.1221-2(b)
11 See section 856(c)(5)(G)(i)
12 See section 856(c)(5)(J)
Call us at +1 213.873.1700, email us at email@example.com or fill out the form below and we'll contact you to discuss your specific situation.
This article was written by John Luksis, Martina Linders and originally appeared on Sep 27, 2021.
2022 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved.
The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM US LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM US LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.
RSM US Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each is separate and independent from RSM US LLP. RSM US LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax, and consulting firms. Members of RSM US Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM US LLP but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmus.com/about us for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. The RSM logo is used under license by RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM US LLP.
Vasquez & Company LLP is a proud member of the RSM US Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms in the United States. RSM US Alliance provides our firm with access to resources of RSM US LLP, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market. RSM US LLP is a licensed CPA firm and the U.S. member of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms with more than 43,000 people in over 120 countries.
Our membership in RSM US Alliance has elevated our capabilities in the marketplace, helping to differentiate our firm from the competition while allowing us to maintain our independence and entrepreneurial culture. We have access to a valuable peer network of like-sized firms as well as a broad range of tools, expertise and technical resources.
For more information on how Vasquez & Company LLP can assist you, please call +1 213.873.1700.
Subscribe to receive important updates from our Insights and Resources.