Insights
We are proud to be named a West Coast Regional Leader for 2024
Tax Court reaffirms IRS lack of authority to assess Form 5471 penalties
ARTICLE | December 08, 2024
Authored by RSM US LLP
Executive summary:
In a procedural victory for taxpayers and despite an adverse decision from a federal appeals court, the Tax Court has reaffirmed that the IRS lacks authority to assess penalties under section 6038(b)(1) for failure to file Form 5471. This decision requires the IRS to pursue civil action rather than administrative assessment and collection to enforce this international reporting penalty.
Case Background
In a procedural victory for taxpayers and despite an adverse decision from a federal appeals court, the Tax Court has reaffirmed that the IRS lacks authority to assess penalties under section 6038(b)(1) for failure to file Form 5471. In Raju J. Mukhi v. Commissioner, 162 T.C. No. 8 (Nov. 18, 2024), the Tax Court effectively required the IRS to pursue civil action rather than administrative assessment and collection to enforce this international reporting penalty.
In Mukhi, the taxpayer established three foreign entities between 2001 and 2005, through which he managed several foreign brokerage accounts. After the taxpayer plead guilty in 2014 to filing false U.S. individual tax returns and failing to file required Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Reports (FBARs), the IRS assessed approximately $11 million in penalties against him. While the Tax Court upheld almost all of these penalties, including $10.9 million under Section 6677 for failure to file Forms 3520 and 3520-A, it maintained that the IRS lacked authority to assess $120,000 under Section 6038(b) for Form 5471 violations.
Jurisdictional implications and enforcement landscape
The significance of the Mukhi decision stems from the Tax Court's national jurisdiction. While the D.C. Circuit reversed a similar holding in Alon Farhy v. Commissioner, 160 T.C. No. 6 (April 3, 2023), that decision is binding only on taxpayers who must litigate in the District of Columbia. Most taxpayers can choose to litigate outside of the D.C. Circuit. Given the broad reach of this decision, the government may appeal.
Looking Forward: Implications for tax practitioners
This decision affects U.S. persons with foreign reporting obligations, who often face substantial penalties for compliance failures. While the $10,000 per year penalty under section 6038(b)(1) remains unchanged, the enforcement mechanism per Mukhi now requires the IRS to pursue civil action rather than administrative assessment. The IRS will likely disagree with the decision in Mukhi and will continue to systemically assess penalties for late filed forms 5471. But this decision remains a hazard of litigation for the IRS.
Section 6038 is part of Subpart A of Part III of Subchapter A of Chapter 61 of Subpart F of the Code. Other penalties in this Subpart A, such as those found in sections 6038A, 6038B, 6038C, 6038D, 6039E, 6039F and 6039G, similarly contain no language which would make them assessable by the Commissioner. Thus, it would not be surprising to see taxpayers facing such penalties argue, that the Commissioner has no authority to collect the penalty without first filing a lawsuit.
The IRS has not issued any administrative guidance on this issue, nor has it yet filed an appeal in the Mukhi case.
Mukhi does not address a taxpayer’s legal liability for the penalties under section 6038(b), only the enforcement mechanisms.
Let’s Talk!
You can call us at +1 213.873.1700, email us at solutions@vasquezcpa.com or fill out the form below and we’ll contact you to discuss your specific situation.
Required fields are marked with an asterisk (*)
This article was written by Alina Solodchikova, John Cardone and originally appeared on 2024-12-08. Reprinted with permission from RSM US LLP.
© 2024 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved. https://rsmus.com/insights/tax-alerts/2024/tax-court-reaffirms-irs-lack-of-authority-to-assess-form-5471-penalties.html
RSM US LLP is a limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent assurance, tax and consulting firms. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients, but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit rsmus.com/about for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International.
The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM US LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM US LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.
Vasquez + Company LLP has over 50 years of experience in performing audit, tax, accounting, and consulting services for all types of nonprofit organizations, governmental entities, and private companies. We are the largest minority-controlled accounting firm in the United States and the only one to have global operations and certified as MBE with the Supplier Clearinghouse for the Utility Supplier Diversity Program of the California Public Utilities Commission.
For more information on how Vasquez can assist you, please email solutions@vasquezcpa.com or call +1.213.873.1700.
Subscribe to receive important updates from our Insights and Resources.